This week, we shall continue to study
the book of 2 Kings in the Old Testament.
(1) Perhaps, Ahaziah did not have sons or they were too young at his death, and so his brother, Joram succeeded him:
a. Why would Joram dare to get rid of Baal worship, especially while his mother, Jezebel was still alive?
b. Why did he not get rid of the worship of the golden-calves as well? What was the biblical verdict about him?
(2) Since the death of Ahab and in the time of Ahaziah, Moab had already begun their revolt (1:1):
a. What reason, implied here, was their revolt due to?
b. What was Joram’s plan?
(3) Should Jehoshaphat join hands with Joram? Why or why not? (1 Ki. 22:2; 2 Chr. 19:1-3)
(4) Do you think Jehoshaphat did enquire of the Lord? (refer to 3:13; 2 Chr. 20:3)
(5) Presumably, the water source that they expected to depend on had dried up unexpectedly:
a. Why did Joram blame God for their plight?
b. Did this show that Joram was, after all, a believer of the Lord? Why or why not?
(6) What is the main message to you today and how may you apply it to your life?
本週我們繼續研讀列王紀下。請慢慢細心讀每天指定的經文至少兩遍,然後反復思考問題。
(1) 相信因亞哈謝沒有兒子,死後由他兄弟約蘭接續他作以色列王:
a. 為何約蘭竟敢把父親所造的巴力柱像除掉,特別那時耶洗別尚在?
b. 為何卻不除掉耶羅波安所造的金牛犢?
c. 聖經對他的評價是什麼?(3:2)
(2) 摩押在亞哈死後,在亞哈謝在位時,就已經背叛(1:1)
a. 這裡給我們知道他們背叛其中的因素是什麼?
b. 約蘭有什麼計劃去對付摩押?
(3) 約沙法是否應與他聯手?為什麼?(參王上22:2;代下19:1-3)
(4) 你以為約沙法有否先求問神?(參3:13; 代下20:3)
(5) 似乎按這三王所估計所有水源乾涸了:
a. 為何約蘭竟埋怨神?(3:10)
b. 這是否證明約蘭是信耶和華的?或是恰恰相反?為什麼?
(6) 今日你得到的主要提醒是什麼?你會怎樣應用在你的生命中?
“He did evil in the eyes of the LORD, but not as his father and mother had done. He got rid of the sacred stone of Baal that his father had made. Nevertheless he clung to the sins of Jeroboam son of Nebat, which he had caused Israel to commit; he did not turn away from them.” (2 Ki. 3:2-3)
Joram was quite unique among the kings of Israel. For one he was the son of Ahab, one of the most notorious and evil kings in the history of Israel whose apostasy was made even more heinous by his wife, Jezebel, who was likely instrumental in bringing Baal worship into Israel (1 Ki. 16:31) and yet Joram dared to get rid of the sacred stone of Baal, the pillar that Ahab erected in Samaria, while his mother, Jezebel was still alive (2 Ki. 9).
One would assume that Joram would return to the worship of the Lord and be one of the rare kings of Israel who did what was right in the eyes of the Lord. However, the Bible says, that he “did evil in the eyes of the LORD, but not as his father and mother had done… Nevertheless he clung to the sins of Jeroboam son of Nebat, which he had caused Israel to commit; he did not turn away from them.” (2 Ki. 3:2-3)
If Joram was so determined to return to the Lord and get rid of the worship of Baal in Israel, why would he not get rid of the golden calves set up by Jeroboam which were just as despicable in the eyes of the Lord? Perhaps, Joram thought that a “half conversion” would suffice. As it turned out, there is no such thing as a “half-conversion” to the Lord. One has to renounce all forms of idols, visible or invisible, and believe in the Lord in order to be saved and be acceptable to the Lord. The rich young ruler in Mark 10 was a case in point, as he left sadly because he could not leave his idol — wealth (Mk. 10:22).
I was sharing the gospel with a Chinese lady just a week or two ago and she listened gladly to my sharing of the gospel. However, when she was contemplating the reception of Jesus Christ as her Lord and Savior, she asked, “I cannot believe in Christ and worship my Chinese traditional gods, right?”. At my affirmation in this respect, she was reluctant to give up her idols. In a sense, she had more integrity than Joram who thought getting rid of the “major” idol, Baal, in Israel was enough. As it turned out, all idols are despicable to the Lord and he was still “evil in the eyes of the Lord”.
「他行耶和華眼中看為惡的事,但不至像他父母所行的,因為除掉他父所造巴力的柱像。然而,他貼近尼八的兒子耶羅波安使以色列人陷在罪裡的那罪,總不離開。」(王下3:2-3)
約蘭在眾以色列王中是較為特別的一位。他是以色列最行惡的王亞哈的兒子。這亞哈因娶了耶洗別而陷民於巴力的敬拜中(見王上16:31) 。希奇的是,約蘭竟在母親尚在的時候,把父親所造的巴力的柱像除掉!
既是這樣,我們會以為約蘭該是回轉歸向了神,而成為以色列罕有「行耶和華看為正的事」的王。誰知聖經卻說:“他行耶和華看為惡的事……他貼近尼八的兒子耶羅波安使以色列人陷在罪裡的那罪,總不離開” (王下3:2-3) 。
約蘭既有這樣的勇氣除掉巴力的敬拜,為何仍堅持金牛犢的敬拜呢?二者同樣是神所憎惡的。或許,約蘭以為「一半」的悔改已足夠了;誰知是沒有「一半的悔改」這回事的。真正的歸向神,是要我們把所有的偶像破除—不論是有形的或是無形的偶像。那想信耶穌、想得永生的少年長官就是一個典型的例子:他憂憂愁愁的走了,因為他沒有放下他的偶像,就是他的財富!(可10:22)
不久之前,我有機會與一婦人談道。她很樂意的聽我分享福音。但當她在考慮應否接受耶穌作救主時,她問:“是否不可一腳踏兩船的?” 意思是,她要信耶穌是否就不能再拜傳統的神靈。雖然她當時不能接受耶穌作救主,至少她比約蘭誠實。約蘭以為把「主要的偶像」除掉就可以,卻不曉得,敬拜不論大小的偶像,仍是「行耶和華眼中看為惡的事」!
(1) Why did Elisha pick on the king of Israel? (v. 13)
(2) Why did the king of Israel insist that the battle was the will of God?
(3) How should Joram feel and what should he do at the rebuke of Elisha? (vv. 13-14)
(4) Based on 1 Samuel 16:16, Keil & Delitzsch explains Elisha’s sending for a harpist was “to collect his mind from the impressions of the outer world by the soft tones of the instrument, and by subduing the self-life and life in the external world to become absorbed in the intuition of divine things” (K&D, 215). What do you think about this comment?
(5) How serious was the plight of the army of the three kings? (v. 17)
(6) What two promises were made by the Lord?
(7) Why was one called easier than the other one? (v. 18)
(8) How quickly was the first promise fulfilled? What might be the significance of the timing being “about the time for offering the (morning) sacrifice” at the temple in Jerusalem?
(9) How did God fulfill the second promise? (vv. 24-25)
(10) Why did the king of Moab offer his firstborn son as a sacrifice?
(11) Why was there fury against Israel? Whose fury was it? (see Lev. 18:21; 20:3)
(12) What is the main message to you today and how may you apply it to your life?
請慢慢細心讀每天指定的經文至少兩遍,然後反復思考問題。
(1) 為何以利沙特要為難以色列王?(3:13)
(2) 為何以色列王堅持這場戰爭是出於耶和華?
(3) 以利沙這樣針對約蘭,約蘭當怎樣回應?
(4) 對於以利沙要找人來彈琴一事,解經家Keil and Delitzsch基於撒母耳記上16:16有這樣的見解:“是要使他的思想從外面世界的思潮藉著柔和的音調能靜下來,並從而克服己心和接觸世界的生命,而能沉浸於屬靈的觸覺中。”(K&D, 215) 你意下如何?
(5) 這三王當時的處境有多嚴重?
(6) 神藉以利沙給他們那兩個應許?
(7) 神稱那一個為「小事」?為什麼?
(8) 第一個應許要等多久便成就?與(在聖殿那裡)獻早祭有什麼關係?
(9) 神怎樣成就第二個應許?(3:24-25)
(10) 為何摩押王竟把自己的長子獻作燔祭?
(11) 為何神卻向以色列人發怒?(參利18:21; 20:3)
(12) 今日你得到的主要提醒是什麼?你會怎樣應用在你的生命中?
“Then he took his firstborn son, who was to succeed him as king, and offered him as a sacrifice on the city wall. The fury against Israel was great; they withdrew and returned to their own land.” (2 Ki. 3:27)
It appears that Elisha did confirm the claim by Joram that this battle by the three kings against Moab was called by the Lord (3:13). That possibly also means Jehoshaphat had likely consulted the Lord first before agreeing to go to battle with the king of Israel, because he had learned his lesson at the rebuke of Jehu, the prophet (2 Chr. 19:1-3) and from then onward, he was “resolved to inquire of the Lord” in matters of war (2 Chr. 20:3).
However, as much as the Lord had called them to this battle and even promised them a sweeping victory, the mandate seemed to be bringing Moab back into submission to Israel only, and not the wiping out of every Moabite, meaning God had not meant them to commit genocide. This appeared to be their intention, as they forced the king of Moab into sacrificing his first-born son as a last attempt to free himself and his men.
The word “fury” according to K&D, “is used of the divine wrath or judgment”, and thus indicates God’s displeasure not only with the act of the king of Moab but also with Israel’s desire to wipe out the Moabites leading to such an act of atrocity that was clearly abhorred by the Lord (Lev. 18:21; 20:3).
While many people like to label the Lord of the Old Testament as a violent God who is bent on exterminating people, nothing can be further from the truth, and this was just one of many examples of a God who truly values the lives of human beings whom He has created in His own image, to the point that He eventually gave His own Begotten Son to die for their sins (Jn. 3:16).
「便將那應當接續他作王的長子,在城上獻為燔祭。以色列人遭遇耶和華的大怒,於是三王離開摩押王,各回本國去了。」(王下3:27)
以利沙沒有斥責約蘭以為這場與摩押的戰役是出於神的(3:13)。這樣看來,約沙法早有向神求問該否與約蘭同盟的,因他自從上次被先知耶戶責備後,就學了功課(代下19:1-3)。後期我們更清楚的讀到他在這方面的改變:“定意(在戰爭前)尋求耶和華”( 代下20:3) 。
雖然這場戰役是出於神,並且神藉以利沙應許他們得勝,但是神的心意是要摩押再次向以色列稱臣,而不是要滅絕摩押人。但在戰爭得勝時,以乎以色列人是在乎盡行殺戮的,以至摩押王在走頭無路時,把自己的長子作燔祭燒死。
中文聖經譯這「大怒」的是耶和華,這是對的。按Keil & Delitzsch的研究所得,這「大怒」是一向用來形容神的憤怒或審判。這怒氣不但是因為摩押王所作的,也是向以色列人發作的,因為他們盡行殺戮的行為是引至摩押王作出這為神所憎惡,叫兒女經火的惡行(見利18:21; 20:3) 。
一般的世人愛把舊約聖經的神看為可怕、喜歡暴力、喜勸殺戮的神。事實是恰恰的相反。這事件正好證明神是寶貴和看重祂以自己形像所創造的人。在新約的時候,我們就讀到這神:“愛世人,甚至將祂的獨生子賜給他們,叫一切信祂的,不至滅亡,反得永生”( 約3:16) 。
The spotlight now reverts back to Elisha, the prophet:
4:1-7—The Plight of the Widow and Orphans of a Prophet
(1) How does this story reflect the life of a prophet at the time of Elisha? (vv. 1-2)
(2) Why would God allow those who serve Him to live in poverty?
(3) What did Elisha ask the widow to do?
(4) How would you react to such words by Elisha?
(5) What did the widow do? And what does this say about her?
(6) What lesson(s) might you have learned from this incident?
4:8-17—The Hospitality of a Godly Woman
(7) How did this mother view what God had given her by her treatment of Elisha? How did it echo the teaching in Ephesians 4:28?
(8) How did this woman demonstrate her thoughtfulness in meeting the needs of Elisha? (4:10)
(9) Why did Elisha think of doing something for this woman? How influential was Elisha given his offer to the woman?
(10) What was the meaning of her answer? (v. 13)
(11) What did Gehazi mean by the words he spoke on behalf of the woman? (v. 14)
(12) Have you noticed how the conversation between Elisha and the woman took place? What do you think was the reason?
(13) What is the main message to you today and how may you apply it to your life?
請慢慢細心讀每天指定的經文至少兩遍,然後反復思考問題。
4:1-7—先知遺屬的困境
(1) 這事情反映出當時作先知的什麼光景?(4:1-2)
(2) 為何神會容許事奉祂的人陷於貧困之中?
(3) 以利沙吩咐寡婦怎樣作?
(4) 如果你是那寡婦,你會怎樣回應他?
(5) 這寡婦怎樣作?這反映出什麼?
(6) 這事件你可以學到那些功課?
4:8-17—敬畏婦人的款待
(7) 這婦人這樣款待以利沙反映出她對財富有什麼態度?這與以弗所書4:28的教導有什麼吻合之處?
(8) 在照顧以利沙的需要上,這婦人怎樣顯出她的細心?(4:10)
(9) 為何以利沙想要為這婦人作一點事?
(10) 這婦人在第13節的回答是什麼意思?
(11) 基哈西對以利沙說什麼?言下之意是什麼?
(12) 你有否留意到這婦人是一直沒有直接與以利沙說話的。你認為原因是什麼?
(13) 今日你得到的主要提醒是什麼?你會怎樣應用在你的生命中?
“She said to her husband, 'I know that this man who often comes our way is a holy man of God. Let’s make a small room on the roof and put in it a bed and a table, a chair and a lamp for him. Then he can stay there whenever he comes to us'.” 2 Ki. 4:9-10)
Hospitality is one of the gifts of the Holy Spirit (Rom. 12:13), and this woman in Shunem set a great example in this respect in these ways:
- She was mindful of the needs of others: She knew that Elisha, as a servant of the Lord needed to travel very often, and often under less than ideal weather and conditions. The need to have a restful night and a quiet place to pray was important to Elisha.
- She understands their wealth was given by God for a purpose: Just as the Apostle Paul teaches us that part of the reason why God gives us wealth is so that we “may have something to share with those in need” (Eph. 4:28). Her subsequent answer to Elisha’s offer to do something for her showed that she was a very content person, and she understood that God had given them wealth so that she could take care of God’s servants.
- She respected her husband: She knew her place in the family, and she did not just go ahead with her idea, but first shared it with her husband, and did so with his consent.
- She also showed great respect to God’s servant by only communicating through Elisha’s servant, Gehazi, fully demonstrating propriety and respect, leaving no room for gossip.
What an example of a hospitality and godliness!
「婦人對丈夫說:我看出那常從我們這裡經過的是聖潔的神人。我們可以為他在牆上蓋一間小樓,在其中安放床榻、桌子、椅子、燈臺,他來到我們這裡,就可以住在其間。」 (王下4:9-10)
「款待」是聖靈所賜的恩賜之一(羅12:13)。這書念婦人在這恩賜方面給我們留下極佳的榜樣。
(1) 她關注別人的需要:她看到以利沙為神奔波的勞苦,他不但常常由西邊的迦密跑到東邊的伯特利,路途艱辛、常遇乾旱。能在中途停下,有安歇之處,對以利沙本人和對神的事工都是重要的。
(2) 她知道自己的豐盛不但是神所賜的,更是有目的的:正如使徒保羅所指出,我們能賺取財物“就可有餘分給那缺少的人”( 弗4:28) 。當以利沙想為這婦人作些事來回報她時,她的回答顯示她是很滿足的(4:13) 。她不但感到滿足,也看到神要藉賜她所有的去照顧祂的僕人。
(3) 她尊重丈夫:她知道自己在家的位份,故此沒有單獨行事,乃把神放在她心中的意念與丈夫分享;得到他的同意後才去作。
(4) 她更是尊重神和祂的僕人的:她在照顧先知之時,一直沒有單獨的與以利沙在一起;所有的溝通都是經過基哈西的。這樣,就避免了別人的閒言閒語了。這是她的智慧,也顯出她是個守本份的婦人。
她這敬虔和愛心的「款待」,真是我們的好榜樣。
We have no idea what kind of illness the child died of, maybe from sunstroke, but it was certainly sudden and unexpected:
(1) What might go through the mind of this mother at the time of her son’s sudden death?
(2) Why did she put the child on the bed of Elisha and then go to fetch Elisha?
(3) Why did she not tell her husband?
(4) What did she say to Elisha? (v. 28) What did she mean?
(5) What did Elisha ask his servant to do? (v. 29)
(6) Why didn’t he go himself?
(7) Did his staff save the boy?
(8) What did Elisha do upon entering the house?
(9) Why did it take his prayers and his twice lying over the boy before he was brought back to life?
(10) What did this mean to Elisha himself?
(11) What did this incident mean to the woman? (v. 37)
(12) What is the main message to you today and how may you apply it to your life?
請慢慢細心讀每天指定的經文至少兩遍,然後反復思考問題。
我們不曉得這孩子是因何病而死,但他的死亡卻是很突然的:
(1) 面對兒子突然的死亡,這婦人心中是怎樣的想?
(2) 她為何抱孩子放在先知的床上,並立即去找他?
(3) 為何不把真情告訴丈夫?
(4) 她對以利沙說什麼?(4:28) 是什麼意思呢?
(5) 以利沙立刻吩咐僕人作什麼?(4:29)
(6) 為什麼他不親自去?
(7) 他的杖有效嗎?
(8) 以利沙進到房間後,作了什麼?
(9) 為何他要禱告,並要兩次的伏在孩子身上才使他活過來?
(10) 這次的經歷叫以利沙有什麼的學習?
(11) 對這婦人又有什麼重要的意義?(4:37)
(12) 今日你得到的主要提醒是什麼?你會怎樣應用在你的生命中?
“Elisha turned away and walked back and forth in the room and then got on the bed and stretched out on him once more. The boy sneezed seven times and opened his eyes.” (2 Ki. 4:35)
Personally, I do think that the “double portion” of the spirit of Elijah given to Elisha was amply demonstrated in the many more miracles performed by Elisha than by Elijah recorded in the Bible. It is perhaps because of this very fact that Elisha had to be reminded from time to time, that it was not really his spirit that could perform any miracle, but the very Spirit Himself. This incident of the death and resurrection of the child was a case in point.
First, he was not even aware of the death of the child and so he said to his servant Gehazi, “but the Lord has hidden it from me and has not told me why” (4:27). The implication appears to be that Elisha did expect God to tell him in advance all the time about important matters like this.
Then, whether his instinct told him to ask Gehazi to put the staff on the boy’s face, or he felt led by the Spirit of God to do so, it turned out that to his disappointment, it did not work.
Then we find him having to shut the door and pray first. In other words, he felt the need to clearly seek God’s direction before he would do anything further. This had to be a humbling experience for Elisha who might have taken his “double-portion” spirit for granted.
Then, I am sure, he was now clearly directed by the Lord to lie himself over the boy, and yet he had to do it twice before the boy was restored to his life.
Therefore, I believe that, as much as this miracle was meant to build up the faith of the woman, it was also meant to remind Elisha that even with the promised double-portion of Elijah’s spirit, the power was not his, but God’s!
I think it is also a good reminder to us today that as we share the gospel, we can only do our part to pray and to share responsibly the complete gospel of salvation through Jesus Christ, repentance and faith can only come from the work of the Holy Spirit, not our persuasion.
「然後他下來,在屋裡來往走了一趟,又上去伏在孩子身上,孩子打了七個噴嚏,就睜開眼睛了。」 (王下4:35)
我個人認為,以利沙所承接「加倍的靈」充份的藉著他所行的神蹟比以利亞為多而顯示出來的。可能因這原故,以利沙需要神的提醒,叫以利沙曉得,能這樣的大行神蹟不是出於他自己的靈,乃是一百份之一百出於神的靈。這次能把書念婦人的孩子起死回生的過程,就是一個好例子。
首先,以利沙自己承認,這孩子的死,“耶和華向我隱瞞,沒有指示我 ”(4:27) 。這句話似乎顯示著,一般而言,以利沙以為神是會事先就指示他的。
既知道了這事,不曉得以利沙有否先禱告,或是憑直覺的吩咐基哈西拿他的杖去放在孩子臉上。但結果沒有效用!
終於他要親自「出馬」。這次,他肯定的先向神禱告,意思是要清楚尋求神的心意,才敢作什麼。這是一個使他謙卑的經歷,知道不能以為有「加倍的靈」就可隨意的行事。
結果,還要兩次的伏在孩子身上,才把他救活。
這神蹟當然顯出神對這婦人的愛憐,也叫這婦人更認識祂;同時也是提醒以利沙,叫他知道這應許的「加倍的靈」是神的靈,所行的神蹟是出於神的大能!
今日我們也需要這個提醒,特別是在我們傳福音的時候:我們的本份是去禱告,並有責任把完整的福音與人分享;至於人的悔改、歸信耶穌,就完完全全是聖靈的工作,與我們說得動聽或有說服力完全無關!
While the spotlight continues to be on Elisha, the various events recorded concerning the school of prophets appear to tell us that these prophets were living in relative poverty:
4:38-41—Bitterness in the Food
(1) Gilgal was a seat for a school of prophets (2:1), and Elisha likely “returned” to reside there for a time: What was the particular situation faced by these prophets at the time?
(2) What did Elisha decide to do for them?
(3) “Death in the pot” probably means that it was very bitter; what was the cause of this bitterness?
(4) If there was no famine and they were not poor, what would they be eating normally?
(5) How did Elisha solve their problem?
(6) Was there any meaning to this miracle to them? What about us?
4:42-44—Feeding of a Hundred (Note: Baal Shalishah is west of Gilgal.)
(7) Again, what does this tell us about the plight of the prophets?
(8) What did this offering of bread baked from the first ripe grain by the man represent? (Prov. 3:9-10; Lev. 23:17)
(9) Did Elisha know that 20 loaves would not be sufficient to feed his fellow prophets when he directed his servant?
(10) What did the Lord tell Elisha in advance?
(11) How would you compare this miracle to the miracles of Jesus in John 6:1-13?
(12) The crowd that Jesus fed obviously knew this miracle of Elisha in the Old Testament, how might they think of Jesus because of His miracle? (Jn. 6:14)
(13) What is the main message to you today and how may you apply it to your life?
請慢慢細心讀每天指定的經文至少兩遍,然後反復思考問題。
這連串有關先知們的記載,給我們看到他們一直是活在貧困中:
4:38-41—苦澀的食物
(1) 在吉甲那地是有先知「學校」(2:1) ,而以利沙是重回那裡居住一段的時間:那時他們面對著什麼情況?
(2) 以利沙要為他們作什麼?
(3) 「鍋中有致死的毒物」相信是指其味甚苦澀:原因是什麼?
(4) 如果當時沒有饑荒、他們也不是如此貧窮,他們需要這樣拾野瓜煮食嗎?
(5) 以利沙怎樣解決這「毒物」的困難?
(6) 這神蹟的記載可有什麼特別意思?
4:42-44 — 使一百人吃飽
(7) 這裡反映著先知們是活在什麼情況?
(8) 這人帶來初熟大麥作的餅有什麼意義?(參箴3:9-10;利23:17)
(9) 當以利沙第一次吩咐僕人派餅時,他曉得二十個餅是不足一百個人吃的嗎?
(10) 神早向以利沙說了什麼的話?
(11) 你可以怎樣把這神蹟與約翰6:1-13耶穌所作的相比?
(12) 耶穌餵飽的群眾當然熟悉舊約這裡的神蹟:他們對耶穌餵飽他們的反應是什麼?(約6:14)
(13) 今日你得到的主要提醒是什麼?你會怎樣應用在你的生命中?
“We have left everything to follow you.” (Mk. 10:28)
After Elijah was taken up to heaven, Elisha became the focal point of the prophetic ministry in the northern kingdom, Israel. But unlike the accounts surrounding Elijah, Elisha’s ministry was often mentioned in the context of a certain group or school of prophets, and from these accounts, we have come to understand that these prophets were living in almost abject poverty.
The earlier account of the death of a prophet who left behind his wife and two sons (who were almost forced to be sold into slavery) appeared not to be an isolated incident (2 Ki. 4:1). The stories of the bitter pot of stew and the feeding of a hundred prophets who appeared to be starving also indicated their relative poverty. The subsequent story of the panic over the lost borrowed axe in chapter six highlights their inability to even repay such an item (6:5). One wonders why God would allow those who “have left everything to follow” Him to be in want all the time? (Mk. 10:28).
Apart from the obvious fact that those who have left everything to follow Him have all made a decision to live by faith, being in want from time to time comes with a life of faith. However, whether it was the miracle of the oil, the turning of the bitter stew into edible food, the feeding of a hundred or the miraculous finding of the lost axe (2 Ki. 4:7, 41, 44; 6:7), they all proved the faithfulness of the Lord. And thus, the Psalmist concludes, “I was young and now I am old, yet I have never seen the righteous forsaken or their children begging bread” (Ps. 37:25).
「彼得就對祂說:看哪,我們已經撇下所有的跟從祢了。」 (可10:28)
當以利亞被提升天後,以利沙就成為神在北國所使用的主要先知了。不過,當讀到以利沙的事奉時,我們會看到他常常是與一群先知在一起;而從這些記載中,我們看到這些先知一直都活在貧困之中。
較早時(王下4:1) ,我們讀到有先知死後遺下的寡婦與兩個兒子被債主迫害的境況,看來不是單獨的事件,乃是一般先知的境況。以利沙為一群先知煮食和以二十個餅餵飽一百個先知的神蹟,都給我們看到他們的經濟困境。在第六章所載,先知失掉借來斧頭時的驚叫,就知道他連買斧頭償還的能力也沒有(6:5) 。這使人不禁的問道:為何神叫那些為祂「已經撇下所有的」人(可10:28)常常落在貧困當中?
當然我們明白,那些蒙召,為神撇下所有的來事奉祂的人,一早已知道、也決定要過「信心的生活」。但是,我們讀過以油供應絕望的先知和寡婦、把苦澀的湯轉成美食、餵飽一百人的神蹟,和尋回失掉的斧頭等等,都充份表示神的信實和供應。也因這原故,詩人就肯定的給我們作見證說:“我從前年幼,現在年老,卻未見過義人被棄,也未見過他的後裔討飯。”(詩37:25)
(1) With the constant conflict between Israel and Aram, how would the people of Israel, including their prophets look upon a person like Naaman?
(2) Why was the girl so confident that Elisha could heal her master?
(3) What was the reaction of the king of Israel (Joram) to the letter from the king of Aram?
(4) Why was his reaction so different from that of the Israeli servant girl?
(5) What did Naaman expect Elisha to do in order to heal him? Was his expectation logical? Why or why not?
(6) Why didn’t Elisha do what was normally expected?
(7) What lesson can we learn about the "ways” of the Lord in performing His miraculous works?
(8) What was the advice of Naaman’s servant?
(9) What was the wisdom in his advice?
(10) What happened when Naaman did the less than spectacular act of simply dipping in the Jordan seven times?
(11) What is the main message to you today and how may you apply it to your life?
請慢慢細心讀每天指定的經文至少兩遍,然後反復思考問題。
(1) 亞蘭既常與以色列爭戰,以色列人(包括先知在內)對亞蘭人,特別是像乃縵作元帥的亞蘭人,有什麼感受?
(2) 為何這被擄的以色列女子如此肯定以利沙能醫好她的主人?
(3) 以色列王(約蘭)對亞蘭王的來信有什麼反應?
(4) 為何王的反應與那被擄的以色列女子是這樣的不同?
(5) 在乃縵的腦海中,他以為以利沙會怎樣醫治他?這樣的想法有何不妥?
(6) 為何以利沙不選擇這樣較「轟天動地」的方法?
(7) 這給我們對神的行事有什麼認識?
(8) 乃縵的僕人怎樣勸導他?
(9) 這勸導內中的智慧何在?
(10) 當乃縵順服去作簡單似沐浴一樣的舉動時,帶來什麼後果?
(11) 今日你得到的主要提醒是什麼?你會怎樣應用在你的生命中?
“My father, if the prophet had told you to do some great thing, would you not have done it? How much more, then, when he tells you, ‘Wash and be cleansed’!” (2 Ki. 5:13)
Unknowingly, we always associate the work of God with the spectacular, or we would not attribute it as the work of God or a miracle. This is indeed a common misconception among people, including Christians. Naaman was no exception.
For one, we have to admire his faith in the Lord God of Israel. He was acting on the words of an Israeli maidservant, and no doubt, he had also asked around about the past history of Elisha. Whatever he had heard had given him confidence that his leprosy could be healed by the God of Elisha. His getting permission from his king, the bearing of not only great gifts but a letter from the king, all pointed to his faith in the God of Elisha.
However, for whatever reason, he thought that such a miraculous deed of healing had to be accompanied by pomp and circumstance, or in his words, he thought, Elisha “would surely come out to me and stand and call on the name of the LORD his God, wave his hand over the spot and cure me of my leprosy” (2 Ki. 5:11). As a result, he was offended by both the refusal of Elisha to greet him personally and his less-than-spectacular way of healing. Fortunately, it was his wise servant who understood the ways of the Lord and explained to him the essence of God’s work — it is never the means but our faith and obedience in Him and His power that matters!
I suggest that we should look around even today, and observe the miraculous deeds of God around us — the rising of the sun, the birth of a child, the blooming of flowers in our backyard, our recovery from the flu, and yes, the breath that we still have today — all are the miraculous deeds of God.
「我父啊,先知若吩咐你做一件大事,你豈不做麼?何況說你去沐浴而得潔淨呢?」 (王下5:13)
我們可能不知不覺的把神蹟與驚天動地的事聯上關係,若非如此,我們就認為不是神蹟。這是一般人的想法,包括基督徒在內。乃縵也不例外。
我們當然欣賞他對以色列的神之信心。單憑那以色列的小婢女之言,或許也加上到處的查問,他就相信以色列的神是能醫治他的大麻瘋的。他得到亞蘭王的批准,拿著王的薦信,走到原為敵國的以色列去求醫,足見他對以利沙的神之信心。
但不知何故,他以為這樣的神所行的神蹟,一定是驚天動地的。就如他所言,他以為以利沙該“站著求告耶和華─他神的名,在患處以上搖手,治好這大痲瘋” (5:11)。故此,因著以利沙不親自出來接見,更作如此簡單的指示,他就感到震怒。幸好他身旁的侍從很有智慧,明白神作事的真諦—不是在乎方法或媒介,乃在乎信心和順服,更在乎神是無所不能的。
我們今日也是如此。不要著眼那些驚天動地的事情,只要仔細察看神在我們每天周圍所作的事—如每日的晨曦、嬰孩的出生、花朵的盛開、感冒得癒、和今日仍有的生命氣息—這些都彰顯著神的大能!
(1) What did this less-than-spectacular healing mean to Naaman and all his attendants?
(2) From hindsight, was Naaman’s sickness a blessing or a curse? Why?
(3) What gifts had Naaman brought with him? (5:5)
(4) Why didn’t Elisha accept Naaman’s gifts?
(5) Should he not accept them, at least for the sake of the other prophets, because they were really poor?
(6) What if Elisha accepted those gifts? What impact might it have on Naaman or his attendants?
(7) What did Naaman wish to take home with him? Why? (v. 17)
(8) Now that Naaman knew that “there is no God in all the world except in Israel”, what dilemma did he face? How did he propose to resolve it?
(9) What was Elisha’s response to his proposal?
(10) What important lesson do we learn from Elisha’s response?
(11) What is the main message to you today and how may you apply it to your life?
請慢慢細心讀每天指定的經文至少兩遍,然後反復思考問題。
(1) 這「簡單」的神蹟對乃縵和他的侍從帶來什麼「震撼性」的後果?
(2) 從這事來看,乃縵的大麻瘋是咒詛還是祝福?
(3) 乃縵帶來什麼禮物?(5:3)
(4) 為何以利沙不接受他的厚禮?
(5) 先知們既是這樣的貧困,以利沙不應為他們的原故接受乃縵的禮物嗎?
(6) 如果以利沙接受了這些禮物,會對乃縵和他的侍從有什麼負面的影響?
(7) 為何乃縵要帶一些以色列的泥土回國?
(8) 乃縵現在既認識到「除了以色列之外,普天下沒有神」,他知道要面對什麼挑戰?他希望怎樣去面對?
(9) 以利沙的回應是什麼意思?
(10) 由這反應我們能領會到什麼真理?
(11) 今日你得到的主要提醒是什麼?你會怎樣應用在你的生命中?
“‘As surely as the LORD lives, whom I serve, I will not accept a thing.’ And even though Naaman urged him, he refused.” (2 Ki. 5:16)
Naaman had brought with him a huge amount of gold and silver as gifts to Elisha, plus ten sets of obviously expensive clothing in keeping with Naaman’s extraordinary position as the commander of the army of Aram (5:5). It is understandable that Elisha would refuse to accept these gifts — he was a man of integrity and he served the Lord not for money or wealth. However, given the abject poverty of the prophets around him, should he not accept those gifts, after Naaman had to be a God-send to alleviate their poverty in a significant way. In today’s economy, he could have used the money to set up a trust and provide for the prophets and their families out of it for a long, long time!
Yet, Elisha flatly refused — not because he did not care about the other prophets, but because of a very important reason. Naaman and his attendants were gentiles who used to worship other gods. Now, through the miraculous healing they had just begun their faith journey in knowing that “there is no God in all the world except in Israel” (5:15). However, if Elisha accepted these exuberant gifts, Naaman, if not his attendants, would think that Elisha and his other prophets were no different from the priests of their gods — they were in it for the money! Since they had just begun to know that Yahweh was the only true God, they would, as a result, think that Yahweh would not be any different from their gods — like servants, like God!
I once was offered a huge sum of money by one of the richest men in Hong Kong to officiate a funeral service for his wife because as a non-believer himself, he “sensed” that the God of Christianity was probably the true God. I still conducted the funeral in strict Christian tradition and took the opportunity to share the gospel for all to hear, but I did not take a dime from him, basically learning from the example of Elisha, lest this gentleman think that God’s servants were just like the priests or monks of pagan religions!
「以利沙說:我指著所事奉永生的耶和華起誓,我必不受。乃縵再三地求他,他卻不受。」 (王下5:16)
乃縵帶來的厚禮,包括750磅的銀子、150磅的金子,和一定很華麗的十套衣裳(5:5),這些當然與他的身份相稱。以利沙把這些禮物一一拒絕,是可以了解的;因為他是神忠心的僕人,絕不為財富所動。但是,他周圍的先知們都是活在貧困當中,他不為自己,也當為他們設想;對嗎?以今日而言,不把這些金錢分派,也可立為基金,豈不解決了神僕人們長期的需要嗎?
然而,以利沙是絕然的拒絕乃縵的好意;不是他不想到其他先知的需要,乃是因為有更重要的原因。我們要知道,乃縵和他的侍從原是拜偶像的外邦人,現在因經歷和目睹了神醫治的大能,他們立時的改變過來,認識到「除了以色列之外,普天下沒有神」(5:15)。如果現在以利沙為自己、或是為眾先知之故而收下如此豐厚的財物,乃縵和他的侍從極可能以他和其他耶和華的先知,與他們偶像的祭司全無分別—都是貪財的。這也叫他們看耶和華,雖是惟一的神,其屬性卻與偶像一樣。
有一次,一位香港巨富邀請我為他剛去世的妻子舉行基督教儀式的喪禮。他雖然不是信徒,但對基督教甚有好感,並渴望在基督教儀式中能感受到的平安。我當然堅持這儀式一定要按基督教的傳統進行,並告訴他,我一定會在儀式中傳講福音信息的。他不但同意,並要給我巨款作酬謝。我一口的拒絕接受。他問:“為甚麼?其他的……都是這樣接受啦!” 感謝主,我靠祂的恩典,能學效以利沙的榜樣,免得讓人以為神的僕人與異教的神職人員一樣!