We shall continue with
the study of the Book of Mark this week.
(1) Read carefully vv. 21-22, the parable of a new patch on an old garment, and of new wine into old wine skin. What then does Jesus refer to as old garment or old wine skin? What then is the new patch or new wine?
(2) Now if Jesus represents the new, in what sense is it (He) new?
(3) Now if the Law of Moses is the old, then in what sense is the Law old?
(4) Applying the above understanding to vv.18-20 (the issue of fasting), why is fasting in the presence of Jesus like mixing the old with the new?
(5) Jesus did leave them for a while, but now the Holy Spirit has come and dwells in each believer. Has fasting then become the “new” again, or does it remain the “old”? What was the purpose of fasting by the disciples of John and the Pharisees that made it “old”?
(6) What is the main message to you today and how may you apply it to your life?
Almsgiving, prayer and fasting were the three “cardinal works” to the Jews. Not that there is anything wrong with these works themselves, except that the Jews had equated their doing of them as righteousness itself. Therefore, in Matthew 6, Jesus points out their error of turning them into “acts of righteousness”.
It is interesting to note that both the Pharisees and the disciples of John were fasting (Mk. 2:18). Perhaps, John’s disciples fasted as a habit, but their fasting was understandable especially when John was in prison and was in danger of being killed. I do not think Jesus took issue with their fasting per se, but He was using this comparison (between the fasting of John’s disciples together with that of the Pharisees, with the appearance of feasting by Jesus and His disciples) to point out Who He really is!
To fast as an act of righteousness is of course wrong as Jesus has already pointed out in Matthew 6. Even if they fasted for the sake of repentance, or as an act of urgent plea to God (for the deliverance of John the Baptist from Herod), or for drawing closer to God, it would have been wrong in the presence of Jesus, because Jesus is God and no one can come to the Father except through Him (Jn. 14:6). This is the point Jesus is trying to make.
As we read in the Book of Acts, the early apostles continued to fast, therefore fasting has not been rendered old, but rather it has been made new, as the apostles obviously learned to fast and pray in Jesus’ name. Anytime, we fast and pray as an act of righteousness, as if we can earn any brownie points from God, we have made it old again. Anytime, we fast or pray not in Jesus’ name, we too have made it old again. We are not only guilty of making it old; we are also guilty of trying to nullify the redemptive work of Christ on the cross.
(1) Go to I Samuel 21:1-6 in which David and his men ate of the consecrated bread that was only meant for priests (see also Lev.24:5-9 and Matt.12:4). How was David’s eating of the consecrated bread justified? From this incident, how would you approach and understand the ceremonial law in the Old Testament?
(2) How then should the Jews interpret and keep the law regarding Sabbath, in spite of the severe wordings in Exodus 32:12-17?
(3) Jesus said, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath”. What does it mean? We do not have to keep any ceremonial law of the OT today, so how may you apply this teaching today?
(4) What do you think the impact of v.28 might have on the Jews that day, given this being the earlier part of Jesus’ ministry?
(5) What is the main message to you today and how may you apply it to your life?
“The
Sabbath was made for man, not man for Sabbath.” (Mk. 2:27)
As great as these words are, if they did not come from the mouth of Jesus, I doubt if anyone would dare to say the same. Not only because in the Law of Moses, it is considered one of the holiest commandments the breach of which is punishable by death, it is also because even with a proper understanding, Sabbath is a time of singular devotion to the Lord. Therefore, Sabbath is meant for God, in God, to God! God, not man, should be the center of Sabbath.
Yet, Jesus points out that Sabbath was made for man! How could He say that? Well, He can, because He is God! He is the One who establishes Sabbath for us to rest from everything to come to worship and draw close to Him. This 4th Commandment dovetails with the 3rd Commandment as a pair, in that the 3rd warns us not to turn our relationship with God to one of utility (using His name in vain), but to pursue a relationship of intimacy as we are told to make Him the center of Sabbath. But this is a mutual relationship; therefore Sabbath is as much for God as it is for us. It is in this sense that Sabbath was made for man, not man for Sabbath.
This is an amazing truth in itself. The Holy God who established such a commandment so that He may enjoy our presence, as much as we enjoy His - that He may enjoy our intimacy as much as we enjoy His!
The Jews were “made” to observe Sabbath, but we who are in Christ, have been drawn into His very presence and intimacy. In other words, we have already entered into His Sabbath. Let’s enjoy it. Let’s enjoy Him!
(1) Read carefully what Jesus said in v.4. Jesus was not really concerned about what was lawful, but rather the real purpose of Sabbath. What is the real purpose of Sabbath according to Jesus?
(2) What had the Jews turned Sabbath into?
(3) Why was Jesus angry? Can you think of similar things in your life and that of the church that might make Jesus angry today?
(4) Mark describes to us that the crowd was growing around Jesus. (Luke sometimes uses “many thousands” to describe the size of the crowd, see Luke 12:1.) The only way Jesus could practically minister to them was to do so from a boat (v. 9). Put yourself into the shoes of three kinds of people in the crowd:
(a) the ordinary people who saw the miracles and heard His preaching
(b) His disciples, like Peter
(c) the religious leaders, like the Pharisees
What might be the best description of each of their attitudes toward Jesus?
(5) What is the main message to you today and how may you apply it to your life?
The four books of the gospel do record incidents where Jesus was angry, but they are not the “norm”. Sure, Jesus was distressed and saddened by the disbelief and rejection of the Jews, but only in a few incidents did He get angry. Mark 3:1-6 was one of these occasions when the Jews cared about the “observance of the law” way more than the life of people. This reminds me of a story I read years ago about a church in one of the poorest cities in America, Camden, New Jersey.
A dying church with just a handful of senior citizens was initially receptive to opening their doors in order to minister to the neighboring poor children through an after-school program. As the program prospered, with an increasing number of kids coming to be tutored (which was so desperately needed in a city like Camden) and more importantly to learn about Jesus, the church was “disturbed” by these energetic children. These few remaining people of the church cared far more about maintaining an empty, tidy shell, than allowing these children surrounded by crime, drugs and guns to take shelter in their only sanctuary. Yes, some of the children did kick open the door on their way into the church. As they were about to kick out the children and the after-school program, their eyes were eventually opened to see that as much these children behaved exactly like children for the most part, they had come to be transformed within by the Holy Spirit. They had the joy of baptizing many of these children into God’s family, in spite of the dents and scratches on the door.
People are important, because God cares about people!
(1) From this small section, it appears that Jesus has attracted more than the Twelve to follow Him, but now He appointed the Twelve and some manuscripts read, “designating them apostles”. On what basis do you think Jesus chose these Twelve?
(2) Why then did He choose Judas Iscariot who eventually betrayed Him?
(3) What is the three-fold purpose for the choosing of these apostles? What is the significance of each of these three aspects?
(4) What is the most significant lesson you have learned today and how can you apply it to yourself?
(1) From vv. 20-21, how would you describe Jesus’ life of ministry? Should it be a model for us? Why or why not?
(2) Why did His family call Jesus “out of His mind”? If you were Jesus, how would you respond to them?
(3) Can you remember the kinds of miracles that Jesus has performed so far? Suppose you are a skeptic. What explanation(s) might you come up with to explain all these away?
(4) What explanation did the teachers of the law come up with?
(5) Jesus did not always address their attacks, but this time He chose to. Why? Was His explanation convincing? Why or why not?
(6) What is the main message to you today and how may you apply it to your life?
Many years ago, I was reading Michael Griffiths’ “Take My Life”. As a young Christian, I was totally surprised to read that he considered a “balance” as something horrible or even nonsense.
Over the years, I have bought into modern Evangelical teachings which consider putting God first does not mean a hierarchical pyramid that puts God on top, followed by family, church, career etc. (or some other order). As a result, I have been seeking to live a balanced life, and have taught others to do so. But every time I return to the examples in Scriptures, especially those of Jesus and His disciples, I seem to see a very different picture. Mark 3:20 is one such example.
“Then Jesus entered a house, and again a crowd gathered, so that He and His disciples were not even able to eat.” (Mk. 3:20). This is hardly a picture of “balance”.
Lightfoot insightfully explains that Jesus led such an unbalanced life that His family feared that it would ruin His health. As a result, they came to “rescue” Him out of His unbalanced life, as they thought He was out of His mind. (Mk. 3:21)
The same goes with His disciples.
I wonder how much time Peter could spend with his wife; why Paul would choose to remain single and why Timothy had problems with his health. Together with Jesus, they did not impress me as examples of a balanced life.
I do not think we should purposely lead an unbalanced life. In fact, to seek to balance our priorities in life among competing demands is only prudent. However, I honestly find Jesus’ words in Luke 2:49 being lived out not only by Him, but by Paul, Peter and other apostles in the Bible — “Did you not know that I must be about My Father’s business?” (NKJV).
Food for thought.
(1) What is meant by blaspheming the Holy Spirit and why would it be an unforgivable sin according to Jesus?
(2) Mark remarks that Jesus said this because they were saying, "He has an evil spirit". So, have they (the teachers of the law) committed such an eternal sin? Why or why not?
(3) How should we then avoid such a sin?
(4) Back in v. 21, the family of Jesus was trying to take charge of Jesus, and now they had come, because they thought He was out of His mind. How did Jesus respond to their action?
(5) What do you think might be the reaction from his mother and brothers?
(6) What does Jesus’ statement in v. 34 mean to you?
(7) What is the main message to you today and how may you apply it to your life?
I wonder what
resolutions you have made earlier last week to begin your New Year. Have you made your growth in your love for
Christ one of your goals in the New Year? In an effort to remind all of us that “being” is far more important than
“doing”, I will continue to introduce you to (or remind you of) the lyrics of
some wonderful hymns that have helped many Christians grow in their love
relationship with the Lord. Allow me to share the following hymn with you: "Thou Hidden Love of God"
(by Gerhard Tersteegen 1697-1769 and Paul Gerhardt 1607-1676;
translated by John Wesley, 1738). It is often sung with the traditional
tune of “Faith of Our Fathers”.
1
Thou hidden Love of God, whose height,
whose depth unfathomed, no man knows,
I see from far Thy beauteous light,
and inly sigh for Thy repose;
my heart is pained, nor can it be
at rest till it finds rest in Thee.
2
Thy secret voice invites me still
The sweetness of thy yoke to prove;
And fain I would; but though my will
Seems fixed, yet wide my passions rove;
Yet hindrances strew all the way;
I aim at thee, yet from thee stray.
3
’Tis mercy all that thou has brought
My mind to seek its peace in thee;
Yet whce my wandering soul shall see.
O when shall all my wanderings end,
And all my steps to theeward tend?
lyrics:
https://hymnary.org/text/thou_hidden_love_of_god_whose_height
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fp9XUp3aouc
Andrew Remillard
The fame of Jesus and the size of the crowd grew at the same time, but it appears that Jesus was speaking mainly in parables to them and Mark selects a few to be retold here. The first one is about the fate of the seeds being sown. Vv. 3-9 is the parable itself and vv.13-20 provides the explanation. It is important to note that in understanding a parable, one has to focus on its central teaching, and not on minor details, unless the latter is being made plain by Jesus himself.
(1) In what ways is the use of the sower and the sowing of seed vividly fitting to the sharing of the gospel?
(2) Can you relate the four outcomes of the seed to people or incidents that you have come across (or in your own life)?
(a) Seeds that fall along the path: Taken away by Satan
- How does Satan do this in a hearer’s heart?
- What can you (the sower) do?
(b) Seeds that fall on rocky places: Dried up by trouble or persecution
- Since trouble or persecution happens “because of the word”, should you encourage the hearer to keep his or her faith secret to avoid it?
- What can you (the sower) do?
(c) Seeds that fall among the thorns: Choked dead by worries, wealth, and worldly desires
- Which of the above might be the most potent in choking a hearer?
- What can you (the sower) do?
(d) Seeds that fall on good soil: Acceptance and multiplication
- How can the soil be good?
- Is there anything you (the sower) can do to make sure the soil of the hearer is good?
(3) What is the core message of this parable to you?
“The secret of the kingdom of God has been given to you. But to those on the outside everything is said in parables…” (Mk. 4:11)
I often wonder why Jesus would do this, as if He was trying to make sure those on the “outside” would never have a chance to understand and repent.
However, the truth of the matter is
(1) Jesus did not say “everything” to the crowds in parables only, like His teaching on divorce in Mark 10:5-9. His teaching was plain and direct, beyond a doubt.
(2) Even the disciples who were not on the “outside” did not necessarily understand His parables, as in this case of the parable of the sower (4:13). This prompted Jesus to lament, “How then will you understand any parables?”.
I believe that whether one is on the “outside” or not is not determined by their physical locale. I am sure there were women with small children who firmly believed in Jesus but were not able to follow Him physically everywhere. But upon hearing His teachings in parables, they had turned “and [were] forgiven”. (Mk. 4:12) Therefore, parables had not been a barrier to their belief.
On the other hand, there were those who were physically following Jesus (Mk. 4:10). They were actually “outsiders” whose ears were so dull that they could not understand His teachings in parables. That obviously included Judas.
Indeed, over the years, I have come to find that the ability to hear and understand the true meaning of God’s word does not depend on one’s intellectual ability or how long one has become a Christian. It depends on one’s readiness to obey what he or she is going to hear; or, in the words of Jesus, how much one loves Him (Jn. 14:21).